Re: ati (fwd)

["Robert G. Brown" <bob@xxxxxxx>]

>>> I agreed with Adams' line of reasoning....
>>ok, i didn't think we were talking about NT here, i just assumed win9...
>>> However, Mr. Williams is a system/network admin ....
>>well, it sounded like to me in his message he was just talking about his
>>roomates problems ...
>That was the first time I attempted to fix a buggy Winbloze that way,  and
>given the success I have performed the same operation many times over.  How
>many exactly I don't know but close to a couple of dozen. ....
More than a mere anecdote.Adam, you're saying that...
1. NT (or WAS it '95) was not stable  
2. Took out the Diamond card,
3. Replaces it with an ATI (and driver)
4. Stability!

Many times?  This is much more serious evidence in favor...

>...not saying that ATI is the fastest (it's not)...
The race does not always go to the swift....

> ... what I have been impressed with is the quality of thier product in the
> stability catagory.
..and sometimes to the steadfast and persistent.

>... mostly against Diamond,  not specifically for ATI. 
Right, I got that; yopu're using ATI because it's one of (perhaps many)
stable cards, compared to Diamond.

>And the contact I have had  with ATI tech support has been pretty impressive.
Always inportant, in any application.
                                                             Regards,
                                                              ---> RGB <---