Re: RH linux and FAT partitions

[Bruce Smith <bruce@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > >Speaking of FAT32 (off topic I know), given the fact that Redhat 5.1 now
> > >supports FAT32 filesystems, that means that a major Linux distribution
> > >now supports FAT32 and NT still doesn't.  Just a interesting observation.
> > 
> > hmm, wasn't slackware a major linux distribution? that had support for Fat32
> > filesystems, err well not right after installation or in the kernel but you
> > could patch it to add support.
> 
> Can't say for certain, since it would open up another can of worms(and
> an xterm)
> but it seems like I have been saying no to fat32 support in the kernel
> for a while now, using source that I foolishly go all the way to finland
> to get.

I think everyone is missing the point here.
It doesn't matter if you count the FAT32 kernel patch or not.

The point is:  Linux has FAT32 support, and Windoze NT does not.

--------------------------------------------
Bruce Smith                bruce@armintl.com
System Administrator / Network Administrator
Armstrong International, Inc.
Three Rivers, Michigan  49093  USA
http://www.armstrong-intl.com/
--------------------------------------------