[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: drives over 2 gigs



Just thought I would put my 2 cents in....
First drive I used was a 4 gig WD IDE....
w/ a 1 gig part for Win95.. 400 megs for NT... and 600 left over for linux,
swap, and a shared partition.

I was able to mount all the filesystems fine.

I was using Partition Magic's Boot loader in the MBR.. and used Lilo in the
Linux Native partition.

BTW... umm.... is this linux here.. or Win95? (read below)

-Chris Strandt

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert J. Kent [mailto:k96rk01@cc.kzoo.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 1998 9:14 PM
> To: klug@klug.armintl.com
> Subject: Re: drives over 2 gigs
>
>
> this may not help answer the question at hand, but i have a related
> question: is anyone on the list SUCCESSFULLY using a drive bigger than 2G
> with linux?  if so, what were the caveats you encountered?  how was LILO
> installation, if you installed it?
>
> > >>Out of curiosity, have you tried repartitioning and formatting using
> > >>another program?
> > >
> > >
> > >yeah, i've tried Partition Magic, for some reason i couldn't get it to
> > >create a fat32 partition.
> > >when i chose to create a new partition it didn't have fat32 as
> a selection,
> > >if i remember right only ntfs, fat32 and something else.
> > >
> >
> > >
> > There's a flag you have to set to use fat32 unless PM senses that
> > you are using Win95B which has native Fat32 support.
> >
> > Ted
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> ___________
>
> 	   But then of course African swallows are not migratory.
> __________________________________________________________________
> ___________
>     rob kent   |    k96rk01@kzoo.edu    |    http://cc.kzoo.edu/~k96rk01/
>