Re: RH linux and FAT partitions

[mike <troll@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

akira@kalamazoo.net wrote:
> 
> >Speaking of FAT32 (off topic I know), given the fact that Redhat 5.1 now
> >supports FAT32 filesystems, that means that a major Linux distribution
> >now supports FAT32 and NT still doesn't.  Just a interesting observation.
> 
> hmm, wasn't slackware a major linux distribution? that had support for Fat32
> filesystems, err well not right after installation or in the kernel but you
> could patch it to add support.

Can't say for certain, since it would open up another can of worms(and
an xterm)
but it seems like I have been saying no to fat32 support in the kernel
for a while now, using source that I foolishly go all the way to finland
to get.

-Mike List