Re: Motion made on Tuesday is now available for commentary

["Matt" <Eagle@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I read the motion, and everything sounds good except for the names.
Personally I don't like the term "unofficial"  It makes it sound like the
meeting is something secretive and under the table.  Right off the bat I
can't think of something better but there must be something.


-Matt Crampton
 Eagle@Mail.Tds.Net


-----Original Message-----
From: Robert G. Brown <bob@acm.org>
To: klug@klug.armintl.com <klug@klug.armintl.com>
Date: Wednesday, August 05, 1998 11:58 PM
Subject: Motion made on Tuesday is now available for commentary


>
>On Tuesday evening, Chris Gidman introduced a motion regarding meetings,
and
>after some discussion, it was agreed that an ammended version of the motion
>would be made available via our web site.  I invite everyone to read and
>comment on the text of this motion:
>
>              http://klug.armintl.com/organize/meeting-move.html
>
>This opens a discussion period which we agreed would end with the meeting
>next Tuesday, so lets all take a look and consider, then comment. As
chairman,
>I will hold my comments until others have written some remarks.  As this
will
>effect the nature of our meetings, and the efforts of some people who help
>present our meetings, it is particularly impotant that we evaluate this and
>discuss.
>                                                          Regards,
>                                                           ---> RGB <---
>
>