[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Motion made on Tuesday is now available for commentary (fwd)
- To: klug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Motion made on Tuesday is now available for commentary (fwd)
- From: "Adam Williams" <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Aug 1998 17:11:11 +0000
- In-Reply-To: root <root@estate1.whitemice.org> "RE: Motion made on Tuesday is now available for commentary (fwd)" (Aug 7, 5:05pm)
- References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980807170500.18279B-100000@estate1.whitemice.org>
> Hey there all... Just wanted to share some thoughts on the motion
> from Tuesday.
>
> 1. I am not sure how this would benefit KLUG as a whole group.
> From what I have observed at meetings, there is not that much business
> conducted during a meeting.. *unless monkey business counts...* :)
> Therefore I don't see a need to have catagories for
> meetings, or seperate meetings.
>
I think there is some advantage as people who are interested in LINUX won't get
interrupted by group issues, and those interested in the GROUP (an LINUX of
course) will know that if soemthing is going to happen(relating to group
structure), it will happen at a particular place and time.
> 2. I do think that it could get confusing if minutes are not taken
> at every meeting, as I am sure business issues will arise during the course
of
> the meeting. We could loose some good thoughts
> and forget aspects of topics discussed if the minutes are not kept..
I agree, no minutes worry me a little. But I don't think it has to be the
secretary who actually takes them. I think he/she just makes sure someone
sends him some, keeps a copy for each meeting, and preferably some misc.
notes and a general track on attendance.