[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: You mean it isn't PERFECT? ;-)

To: klug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: You mean it isn't PERFECT? ;-)
From: Mike List <troll@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 11:10:39 -0500
Organization: heheh....yeah, right
References: <36600828.6BA1@net-link.net> <36601E16.E50FD5E8@armintl.com>
Sender: roscoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Bruce Smith wrote:
> 
> > Would any sysadmins (or anyone, for that matter) care to comment on this
> > article?
> >
> > ***************************************************************
> > http://www.abcnews.com/sections/tech/FredMoody/moody981120.html
> > ***************************************************************
> 
> Sure, how can I resist!   :{)
> 
> > Are the 'shortcomings' cited as bad as they sound?  Just curious...
> 
There has been some news coverage of a PR firm's proposal to start a
bogus "grassroots" campaign to counter the bad publicity MS has racked
up in the recent past. The proposal(Sorry, I don't have an URL)
specified professional shills posing as joe sixpack,  or regular
computer user and would attack the DOJ for persecuting the best software
company, exemplary bastion of capitalism,  etc, and extol the virtues of
clueless computing in general. This may the first shot over the bow.

-- 


-Mike List

References:
- You mean it isn't PERFECT? ;-)
  - From: Chris Chio
- Re: You mean it isn't PERFECT? ;-)
  - From: Bruce Smith

Prev by Date: Re: You mean it isn't PERFECT? ;-)
Next by Date: Re: You mean it isn't PERFECT? ;-)
Prev by thread: Re: You mean it isn't PERFECT? ;-)
Next by thread: Re: You mean it isn't PERFECT? ;-)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread