[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Conection speeds ...Fw: Help me convince my boss
- To: <klug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Conection speeds ...Fw: Help me convince my boss
- From: "Michael Small" <smalliis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 11:41:45 -0400
- References: <001201be9060$30ada8a0$1e0000ac@Workstation2> <9904270948.ZM9394@estate1.whitemice.org>
What are typical necessary connectivity speeds, say for
3 simultaneous users
5 simultaneous users
10 simultaneous users
to have an acceptable surfing experience?
----- Original Message -----
From: Adam Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org>
To: <klug@klug.armintl.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 1999 5:48 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Help me convince my boss
>
> > > > up. This is still more convient than everyone needing their own
phone
> > > line,
> > > > but not good enough. What can NT/Back Office/Small Business Server
do
> > > that
> >>> Linux in cannot this respect? He is a very dedicated NT guy (not at
using
> >>> it, just
> >>> at selling it) (we sell software and support to small businesses), so
I
> >>> need to make this dial up process at least as easy from an end user
stand
> >>> point as it would be under NT. I have heard of demand dialing, but
don't
> >>> know anything about it or where to start looking.
> >>> The perfect scenario at this point would be: Workstation request
> >>> information on the net, server dials. Server detects no localnet to
> >>> internet activity, times out and disconnects automagically. If the
server
> >>> could do that, with very, very, very little attention once it was
setup and
>
> There is a document in the "Tech Notes" of the KLUG web server on how to
do
> exactly that. It is called "Demand Dialing", my system has been doing it
for
> years with great success. Older kernels use something called "diald" for
> demand dialing, new kernels can do it with no additional processes
(except
> pppd of course). Use the new method, as diald has some rather serious
> problems.
>
> >>> could run reliably, I think he would consider using linux. I also am
faced
> >>> with learning sendmail (or some mail handler) because he would be
using
> >>> exchange if he had NT set up.
>
> Sendmail is not as bad as you think. At sendmail.org they have
step-by-step
> instructions for setting up diffrent things. I've used that site with
great
> success, ther're may also be GUI setup tools at freshmeat, I recall
vaguely
> seeing a few of these.
>
> >>> I would appreciate ANY little tid bits of advice, hints, urls, or
> >>> anything else you can throw at me.
>
> You have run linuxconf,yes? this is a very impressive tool.
>
>