[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fw: interesting reply

To: os-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Fw: interesting reply
From: John Bridleman <jbridleman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 03:54:26 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20010405220718.5385c7a4.awilliam@whitemice.org>; from awilliam@whitemice.org on Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:07:18PM -0400
References: <016201c0be21$8c498300$0100000a@dennis> <20010405220718.5385c7a4.awilliam@whitemice.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

> >I thought you all might get a kick out of this "professional's" reply to a
> >message I posted.
> 
Typical FUD. Maybe it's the lateness of the hour but I'm really getting sick of it. 

Take, for example, this recent article on /. - http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/04/04/1345213&mode=thread  Clearly this guy doesn't get it - and I could care less. It makes no difference. Linux is what Linux is. MS is what MS is.

Those that want to use Windows I say - "Have a nice day". I've got better things to do than try to convince someone that Linux is a better solution "most" of the time.
--
John Bridleman / jbridleman@voyager.net

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fw: interesting reply
  - From: Adam Tauno Williams

References:
- Re: Fw: interesting reply
  - From: Adam Tauno Williams

Prev by Date: Re: Fw: interesting reply
Next by Date: Re: Fw: interesting reply
Prev by thread: Re: Fw: interesting reply
Next by thread: Re: Fw: interesting reply
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread